问题回答（QA）对知识库（KBS）的挑战是充满挑战的，因为所需的推理模式多样化，本质上是无限的，类型的推理模式。但是，我们假设以大型KB为基础，以回答各自子图中各个实体的查询类型所需的推理模式。利用不同子图的本地社区之间的这种结构相似性，我们引入了一个半参数模型（cbr-subg），（i）一个非参数组件，每个查询，每个查询，都会动态检索其他类似的$ k $ - $ - $ - $ - near-neart-tebrienk（KNN）培训查询以及查询特定的子图和（ii）训练的参数组件，该参数分量可以从KNN查询的子图中识别（潜在的）推理模式，然后将其应用于目标查询的子图。我们还提出了一种自适应子图收集策略，以选择特定于查询的compact子图，从而使我们可以扩展到包含数十亿个事实的完整freebase kb。我们表明，CBR-SUBG可以回答需要子图推理模式的查询，并在几个KBQA基准上的最佳模型竞争性能。我们的子图收集策略还会产生更多紧凑的子图（例如，webQSP的尺寸减小55 \％，而将答案召回的召回率增加4.85 \％）\ footNote {代码，模型和子码头可在\ url {https://github.com上获得。 /rajarshd/cbr-subg}}。

We present the Group Propagation Vision Transformer (GPViT): a novel nonhierarchical (i.e. non-pyramidal) transformer model designed for general visual recognition with high-resolution features. High-resolution features (or tokens) are a natural fit for tasks that involve perceiving fine-grained details such as detection and segmentation, but exchanging global information between these features is expensive in memory and computation because of the way self-attention scales. We provide a highly efficient alternative Group Propagation Block (GP Block) to exchange global information. In each GP Block, features are first grouped together by a fixed number of learnable group tokens; we then perform Group Propagation where global information is exchanged between the grouped features; finally, global information in the updated grouped features is returned back to the image features through a transformer decoder. We evaluate GPViT on a variety of visual recognition tasks including image classification, semantic segmentation, object detection, and instance segmentation. Our method achieves significant performance gains over previous works across all tasks, especially on tasks that require high-resolution outputs, for example, our GPViT-L3 outperforms Swin Transformer-B by 2.0 mIoU on ADE20K semantic segmentation with only half as many parameters. Code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/ChenhongyiYang/GPViT .

We study the classic facility location setting, where we are given $n$ clients and $m$ possible facility locations in some arbitrary metric space, and want to choose a location to build a facility. The exact same setting also arises in spatial social choice, where voters are the clients and the goal is to choose a candidate or outcome, with the distance from a voter to an outcome representing the cost of this outcome for the voter (e.g., based on their ideological differences). Unlike most previous work, we do not focus on a single objective to optimize (e.g., the total distance from clients to the facility, or the maximum distance, etc.), but instead attempt to optimize several different objectives simultaneously. More specifically, we consider the $l$-centrum family of objectives, which includes the total distance, max distance, and many others. We present tight bounds on how well any pair of such objectives (e.g., max and sum) can be simultaneously approximated compared to their optimum outcomes. In particular, we show that for any such pair of objectives, it is always possible to choose an outcome which simultaneously approximates both objectives within a factor of $1+\sqrt{2}$, and give a precise characterization of how this factor improves as the two objectives being optimized become more similar. For $q>2$ different centrum objectives, we show that it is always possible to approximate all $q$ of these objectives within a small constant, and that this constant approaches 3 as $q\rightarrow \infty$. Our results show that when optimizing only a few simultaneous objectives, it is always possible to form an outcome which is a significantly better than 3 approximation for all of these objectives.

In order to assist the drug discovery/development process, pharmaceutical companies often apply biomedical NER and linking techniques over internal and public corpora. Decades of study of the field of BioNLP has produced a plethora of algorithms, systems and datasets. However, our experience has been that no single open source system meets all the requirements of a modern pharmaceutical company. In this work, we describe these requirements according to our experience of the industry, and present Kazu, a highly extensible, scalable open source framework designed to support BioNLP for the pharmaceutical sector. Kazu is a built around a computationally efficient version of the BERN2 NER model (TinyBERN2), and subsequently wraps several other BioNLP technologies into one coherent system. KAZU framework is open-sourced: https://github.com/AstraZeneca/KAZU

成功的材料选择对于设计和制造产品的设计自动化至关重要。设计师通过通过性能，制造性和可持续性评估选择最合适的材料来利用他们的知识和经验来创建高质量的设计。智能工具可以通过提供从先前的设计中学到的建议来帮助具有不同专业知识的设计师。为了实现这一目标，我们介绍了一个图表表示学习框架，该框架支持组装中身体的物质预测。我们将材料选择任务作为节点级预测任务，对CAD模型的汇编图表示，并使用图形神经网络（GNN）对其进行处理。在Fusion 360画廊数据集上执行的三个实验协议的评估表明我们的方法的可行性，达到了0.75 TOP-3 Micro-F1分数。提出的框架可以扩展到大型数据集，并将设计师的知识纳入学习过程。这些功能使该框架可以作为设计自动化的推荐系统以及未来工作的基准，从而缩小了人类设计师与智能设计代理之间的差距。

Systems Biology试图创建生物系统的数学模型，以减少固有的生物学复杂性，并为治疗性开发等应用提供预测。但是，确定哪种数学模型正确以及如何最佳地到达答案仍然是一个挑战。我们提出了一种使用系统生物学和可能性无推理方法的数学模型选择自动生物学模型选择的算法。我们的算法显示，在实验生物学和随机搜索中使用的常规启发式方法的先验信息中，在正确的模型中表现出了改善的性能。该方法显示有望加速生物基础科学和药物发现。

可以与其他代理人互动以完成给定任务的自主代理的发展是人工智能和机器学习研究的核心领域。为了实现这一目标，自主代理研究小组开发了用于自主系统控制的新型机器学习算法，特别关注深度强化学习和多代理强化学习。研究问题包括可扩展的协调代理政策和代理间沟通；从有限观察的情况下对其他代理的行为，目标和组成的推理；以及基于内在动机，课程学习，因果推断和代表性学习的样品学习。本文概述了该小组正在进行的研究组合，并讨论了未来方向的开放问题。

临时团队合作（AHT）是创建一个必须与以前看不见的队友合作而没有事先协调的问题。许多现有的AHT方法可以归类为基于类型的方法，这些方法需要一组预定义的队友进行培训。为训练设计队友类型是一个具有挑战性的问题，它决定了在训练期间与队友类型打交道时的代理商的概括性能。在这项工作中，我们提出了一种基于最大化最佳响应多样性指标的不同队友类型的方法。我们表明，我们提出的方法会产生队友类型，这些类型需要在协作期间从学习者那里获得更广泛的最佳反应，这可能会提高学习者在AHT中的稳健性与替代方法相比。

我们提出了小说的少量团队合作（FST）问题，在该问题中，在团队中训练有素的熟练代理人完成一项任务与来自不同任务的熟练代理相结合，并且必须共同学习适应一个看不见但相关的任务。我们讨论如何将FST问题视为解决两个单独的问题：一种减少培训代理团队完成复杂任务所需的经验；与陌生队友合作完成了一项新任务。解决FST的进展可能会导致多方面的强化学习和临时团队合作的进步。

可靠的概括是安全ML和AI的核心。但是，了解神经网络何时以及如何推广仍然是该领域最重要的未解决问题之一。在这项工作中，我们进行了一项广泛的实证研究（2200个模型，16个任务），以研究计算理论中的见解是否可以预测实践中神经网络概括的局限性。我们证明，根据Chomsky层次结构进行分组任务使我们能够预测某些架构是否能够推广到分布外输入。这包括负面结果，即使大量数据和训练时间也不会导致任何非平凡的概括，尽管模型具有足够的能力完美地适合培训数据。我们的结果表明，对于我们的任务子集，RNN和变形金刚无法概括非规范的任务，LSTMS可以解决常规和反语言任务，并且只有通过结构化内存（例如堆栈或存储器磁带）可以增强的网络可以成功地概括了无上下文和上下文敏感的任务。